Gene Talk #6: Injecting Sense
From being friends with Kristina of Autism Vox, I know that genetics is a hot button topic in the autism community or “fighting words” as she calls them. But I don’t think I quite “got it” until I read this past week’s Injecting Sense post by Wade Rankin.
If the construct of autism is defined by a constellation of dysfunctions, an appropriate response includes interventions to counteract the problems. If, on the other hand, autism is a mere cognitive difference that resulting solely from genetics unrelated to any environmental insult, then no amount of intervention will make a difference anyway. From the practical side, the real issue becomes safety of protocols. The ethical dilemma, however, is unresolvable.
For her part, Ms. Baggs feels it remains unethical to not “accept” the autistic child “as is,” regardless of whether the cause is genetic or environmental. I don’t think the question is that easily answered. I believe the answer lies in the heart of each parent of an individual autistic child. I speak only for myself when I say my conscience is clear.
Read more to understand more.
Technorati Tags: genetics, genetics of autism, autism, autistic, genes, genetics, dna, disease, health
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Featured Genetics and Health Blogs, Gene Talk, Genetics of Disease
.gif)
0 opinions for Gene Talk #6: Injecting Sense
No one has left a comment yet. You know what this means, right? You could be first!
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: