Discontentment Brews Over The Genographic Project
National Geographic has been running The Genographic Project since early 2005. Instead of being focused on the genetics of disease, The Genographic Project is interested in using DNA variations as a form of genetic archaelogy to track historical human migration and the development of racial groups from the beginning of human evolution. Not surprisingly, many indigenous groups have expressed their distrust of the project, including the Maori of New Zealand and now Alaska natives.
The New York Times has an in-depth look at what’s going on with The Genographic Project at present.
At issue is whether scientists who need DNA from aboriginal populations to fashion a window on the past are underselling the risks to present-day donors. Geographic origin stories told by DNA can clash with long-held beliefs, threatening a world view some indigenous leaders see as vital to preserving their culture.
But more importantly, indigenous leaders and others fear legal repercussions. For instance, DNA evidence might show that some members of the tribe aren’t related genetically and would then lose benefits. Or that legal claims over certain land, property, and rights be revoked.
What do they want? They want National Geographic to stop “sucking indigenous blood.”
The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues recommended the halt of The Genographic Project this past May. It’s practically at a standstill anyway since almost every federally recognized tribe in North America is refusing to participate.
How much do people really care about their ancestors and their roots? If you were to ask me, I’d say very little. But as evidenced by the popularity of genealogy, plenty of people want to know as much as they can whether because of simple curiosity or a feeling of being connected to something more than the superficial aspects of living on this earth at this moment.
Clearly, scientists and others connected with The Genographic Project need to do a better of job of communicating the overarching goals and benefits such a study can achieve. After all, each of us is not just part of separated ethnic groups, but also part of the human race.
Technorati Tags: natioanl geographic, genographic project, indigenous groups, native american indians, alaska indians, alaska, maori, genetics, genes, dna, diseases, illness, health
Related Stories
POSTED IN: General Genetics and Health

.gif)


5 opinions for Discontentment Brews Over The Genographic Project
Anthropology.net
Dec 13, 2006 at 6:21 am
Indigenous peoples contend the Genographic Project…
News of contention of indigenous peoples with participating the Genographic project has been sitting in flagged for me to post about in my RSS reader for sometime, and actually Razib and Hsien have both gotten to it before I have. Both of them have wri…
Genetics and Health » Pacific Genes & Life Patents Book
Mar 20, 2007 at 10:58 pm
[…] several years, indigenous groups have taken issue with scientists studying their DNA. When National Geographic began collecting DNA samples for The […]
sarahparkin.com » New book: Analysis of the Commodification & Ownership of Life
May 1, 2007 at 7:39 am
[…] I received the link to the book as well as the following from Aroha Mead: For several years, indigenous groups have taken issue with scientists studying their DNA. When National Geographic began collecting DNA samples for The […]
New book: Analysis of the Commodification & Ownership of Life | Etixet
Jan 7, 2008 at 2:12 pm
[…] several years, indigenous groups have taken issue with scientists studying their DNA. When National Geographic began collecting DNA samples for The […]
Informed consent, exploitation and “Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals” | Etixet
Jan 7, 2008 at 2:14 pm
[…] has been written on these issues and is freely available at the link below: For several years, indigenous groups have taken issue with scientists studying their DNA. When National Geographic began collecting DNA samples for The […]
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: